The New Rebels Haven Forum!! Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» The New Rebels Haven Forum!! » 64 Bit Motherboards, CPU's, and Operating Systems » DFI 64 Bit Motherboards » Venice Results on DFI Ultra-D

   
Author Topic: Venice Results on DFI Ultra-D
Polygon
Admin
Member # 1

Icon 2 posted      Profile for Polygon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Venice Results on DFI Ultra-D

If you have a Venice CPU in your system, post your results. Include:

1. Venice Model and stepping/date code

2. Motherboard model name with revision, if any...

3. Bios Version, speeds, multipliers, voltages, and memory timings...

4. Specs of system(Video Cd, PSU, Memory brand- Model, speed and size)

This topic is only for Venice owners, Please... [Smile]

--------------------
Too Many Computers,... Too Little Time .....  - Damn Phenoms!

Posts: 25194 | From: Fire Island, NY | Registered: Feb 2003
Polygon
Admin
Member # 1

Icon 2 posted      Profile for Polygon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Venice on the DFI Ultra-D, really tested it's ability... This system typically runs a FX-55 and it's capable of 8X360FSB

Specs
DFI nF4 LP Ultra-D
ADA3500DAA4BP
CBBLE 0512DPAW
BIOS: 310P
CPU: Maze4 Waterblock
Chipset: Stock Cooler
Memory: A-Data DDR600 200 1T 2.5-3-3-14
eVga PCX5750 Video Card
Western Digital IDE 20Gig ATA100
Tagan 480Watt PSU


The system booted into Memtest86 at 10X300, but hung in test #4... Backed off to 10X295... Note Memtest mis-identifing the Venice...

 -


The unfortunate thing with the A64 systems, is no half multipliers. This forces certain settings which may not be optimum. To back off on the multiplier to 9X would require the FSB to go to 327. The A-Data won't run that high at 2.5-3-3-14, so I'm stuck under 300... But the Venice is a real winner!

 -

Note the poor memory bandwidth and the somewhat poor SuperPI score. I guess the 512K cache makes the difference....

Also note the CPU temp in the lower right hand corner... While I am water cooled, the FX-55 at lower speeds, ran the temp about 10°C higher...

--------------------
Too Many Computers,... Too Little Time .....  - Damn Phenoms!

Posts: 25194 | From: Fire Island, NY | Registered: Feb 2003
Polygon
Admin
Member # 1

Icon 2 posted      Profile for Polygon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Switched the FX-55 back into the system. While it's not memtest stable until I back down the FSB to 10X285, the bandwidth is 10-15% higher due to the 1Meg cache...

So, while the Venice overclocks higher then the FX-55 in the same system, the speed as measured by the bandwidth and SuperPI, is less then the FX-55....

--------------------
Too Many Computers,... Too Little Time .....  - Damn Phenoms!

Posts: 25194 | From: Fire Island, NY | Registered: Feb 2003
NPlack
Platinum Member
Member # 479

Icon 1 posted      Profile for NPlack     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Wow! That is very suprising on the bandwith issue. Guess it really starts bottlenecking the CPU at high frequencies like that. Although... i wouldnt exactly call DDR600 a bottleneck [Wink]

Im sure with a little tweaking you can hit that 3G mark with the new core! Still, awesome results!

-Plack

--------------------
Lap: Dell Vostro 1500/1.6GHz C2D/4GB RAM/Nvidia 8400GS 128MB/15.4"
Desk: E8400 9x433(3.9GHz)@1.35v/Gigabyte G33M-DSR2/4GB RAM/ATi 3850 256MB/37" Westinghouse 1920x1080
My Photo works on Deviant Art

Posts: 1313 | From: Hephzibah, GA | Registered: Jan 2004
Polygon
Admin
Member # 1

Icon 2 posted      Profile for Polygon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This Venice is a 3500. The bargins will be 3200 or 3000 if it will be available...

--------------------
Too Many Computers,... Too Little Time .....  - Damn Phenoms!

Posts: 25194 | From: Fire Island, NY | Registered: Feb 2003
thesaucier
New Member
Member # 1124

Icon 1 posted      Profile for thesaucier     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It is nice seeing these results as I should be getting my 3500 V monday.

--------------------
DFI NF4 SLI-DR
3500+ V water cooling cooling
2 X 6800GT
Ocz 4800 (TccD) ee 2X512

Posts: 34 | From: cal | Registered: Dec 2004
Clevor
Senior Member
Member # 1107

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Clevor     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Polygon, seems you are running the 2x256 TCCD in your tests? I'm curious, how do the LEs you had earlier do with the Venice on this board? Didn't they do 300 at 2.5-3-3-6?

Sorry if I missed anything: I was on vacation for a week.

And yes, going from a Winnie to an FX-55 you gain about 300-400 points in 3DMark2000/2001 due to the 1MB L2. Also 2x256 MB sticks lose a lot of bandwidth to 2x512.

Also, your results suggest the memory controller on the Venice is better than the FX-55???

Posts: 234 | From: Japan | Registered: Dec 2004
Polygon
Admin
Member # 1

Icon 2 posted      Profile for Polygon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have a Venice 3000 coming and will install it in the DFI Ultra-D... Right now I'm running the 3500 Vinnie in the MSI Neo4 Plat and am having a limit of 295 with the 2X512 "LE"s. But that is probably the board....

When I get the 3000, I'll go back to the DFI.... [Smile]

In testing the 5 nF3/nF4 boards with the Vinnie, I've only had to make minor changes to the mem timings to reduce or eliminated errors in Memtest...

--------------------
Too Many Computers,... Too Little Time .....  - Damn Phenoms!

Posts: 25194 | From: Fire Island, NY | Registered: Feb 2003
Clevor
Senior Member
Member # 1107

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Clevor     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
How do you identify a Venice? The -BP at the end of the stepping?
Posts: 234 | From: Japan | Registered: Dec 2004
Polygon
Admin
Member # 1

Icon 2 posted      Profile for Polygon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I guess:

"BP" = Venice

"BN" = San Diego

--------------------
Too Many Computers,... Too Little Time .....  - Damn Phenoms!

Posts: 25194 | From: Fire Island, NY | Registered: Feb 2003
JSF
New Member
Member # 1635

Icon 1 posted      Profile for JSF     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
the venice cores , their yeilds must not have scaled as well as we had all hoped .

to me it looks like the "BP"s are just taking too much v-core . could be another "lottery-core"--LOL

--------------------
NA

Posts: 10 | From: LA | Registered: May 2005
JSF
New Member
Member # 1635

Icon 1 posted      Profile for JSF     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
i just ordered a dfi-lan party ultra D/OEM from the egg today . got a nice deal on it if it works out .

not that i am not happy with the a8n-sli dlx , but i think it could clock higher if it had more voltage on the nvidia bridge.

--------------------
NA

Posts: 10 | From: LA | Registered: May 2005
coolmonk
New Member
Member # 1243

Icon 1 posted      Profile for coolmonk     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Actually the Venice cores are all assorted. The steppings on them really determine which ones require more vcore to overclock. The best ones are the "PAW" chips whether it be DPAW or APAW, if you've got one...you know what I mean. My 3200+ LBBLE 0515APAW does 2.75Ghz Prime stable with stock vcore. 2.8Ghz and higher requires only 1.5v...this is all on air cooling w/ an XP-120. My max overclock is 2.91Ghz but requires 1.53v....not bad eh? I might look into some higher-end watercooling to see if I can reach 3Ghz!

--------------------
AMD Athlon 64 3200+ "LBBLE 0515APAW"
DFI LanParty UT nF4 Ultra-D
Antec NeoPower 480W
OCZ PC3200 EL Platinum Revision 2 v1.1
BFG NVidia GeForce 6600GT
Western Digital 80GB 7,200 RPM S-ATA [x2 RAID 0]

Posts: 24 | From: MN, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
   

Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Main Page | Privacy Statement

Copyright© 2002-2008 Lejabeach Dot Com, Inc.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2